gleeson

Registered: April 09, 2009
Posts: 781
| |
thatsmytiki Registered: July 20, 2010
Posts: 11
|
| | Aug 01, 2010 at 01:02 PM | Reply with quote | #17 |
|
| finally I can post new photos....hopefully you guys will actually help me and this thread hasnt just fallen to the wayside to see pics cos once again they are too large to put on this site |
| Loading... | |
Shugenja

Registered: April 08, 2009
Posts: 293
|
| | Aug 04, 2010 at 11:34 AM | Reply with quote | #18 |
|
| The netsuke is very nicely carved and seems consistent with the work of Jugyoku. It's likely to be the carver considered Jugyoku II, as it seems to be late 19th century work. Although some might argue the point, to me the placement of the himotoshi does not appear to present an issue... it should allow the netsuke to sit with good posture on the upper line of the obi. Try it. |
| Loading... | |
thatsmytiki Registered: July 20, 2010
Posts: 11
| |
fk Registered: June 30, 2009
Posts: 144
|
| | Aug 08, 2010 at 05:42 AM | Reply with quote | #20 |
|
The build-up of dirt is an indication of age and part of the patina. Apart from using a soft brush to get rid of the obvious dust, it's best left as is. If you are really compelled to clean it, use a smear of oil (grapeseed or walnut as these don't turn rancid) and a very soft brush/toothbrush. Be careful if there are any inlays. Once it's finished, take off the surplus oil with a piece of cotton jersey - tee-shirt material - and polish with the same rag.
Never use water on wooden netsuke. __________________ http://netsukenow.blogspot.com/ |
| Loading... | |
Shugenja

Registered: April 08, 2009
Posts: 293
|
| | Aug 08, 2010 at 04:09 PM | Reply with quote | #21 |
|
| I agree completely with what fk says about cleaning... using only the tinniest amount of oil necessary. Usually I don't do anything, unless they REALLY need it.
As far a valuation goes... your insurance agent isn't going to care what some unknown person on an internet forum says, especially if there's a claim. The first thing they usually ask for is a receipt. And what's that going to be... under $1 ?
But for a general idea of value, do some internet research at auction house sales (Chrisite's, Bonhams, Eldred's and Sotheby's) for comparable pieces by the same carver... looking for listings in 'past' sales, of course. |
| Loading... | |
DSW90049

Registered: April 05, 2009
Posts: 1,044
|
| | Aug 09, 2010 at 06:47 AM | Reply with quote | #22 |
|
What appears to be long hair behind the turtle, I'm going to guess from what I learned in another thread, is seaweed, no? I like this netsuke more and more. It has a nice So School look about it and is very well carved.
__________________ DSW |
| Loading... | |
chonchon Registered: May 18, 2005
Posts: 2,028
|
| | Aug 09, 2010 at 07:04 AM | Reply with quote | #23 |
|
' Minogame' or literally 'turtle with rice-straw cape'. Agreed with David. This Netsuke is definitely growing on me too. The mark of a good Netsuke?  |
| Loading... | |
AFNetsuke

Registered: Dec 09, 2008
Posts: 632
|
| | Aug 09, 2010 at 05:26 PM | Reply with quote | #24 |
|
Well, David, if minogame are growing on you here is my piece with a total of 25 mossy-tailed turtles in lacquer. You only see the underside of a couple on this piece. It was my understanding that if they lived to an age of 1000 years and were somewhat slow moving creatures (not from my snorkling experience however), then the moss will grow and flow off their backs. Regardless, it's a nice subject when portrayed in netsuke. Attached Images:
|
| Loading... | |
OldKappa Registered: Jan 24, 2007
Posts: 782
|
| | Aug 09, 2010 at 09:25 PM | Reply with quote | #25 |
|
A minogame impromptu convention? I have never seen so many together. |
| Loading... | |
AFNetsuke

Registered: Dec 09, 2008
Posts: 632
|
| | Aug 09, 2010 at 09:42 PM | Reply with quote | #26 |
|
Old Kappa, here's the other side with more old turtles. A question for our lacquer experts: when you look at the magnified picutes you can see that where there is some rubbing on the lacquer there seems to be red pigment underneath. Minimally perceptible but is this something that was done under gold lacquer for some reason or is it my imagination? Attached Images:
|
| Loading... | |
fk Registered: June 30, 2009
Posts: 144
|
| | Aug 10, 2010 at 03:50 AM | Reply with quote | #27 |
|
Yes, it's a lacquer ground that was used before the top layers of decorative lacquer/makie-e were applied. Sometimes it was thickened with various clays and powders and used to form slight relief work on the piece.
Japanese lacquerware mostly had three layers, an undercoat, often an ochre colour, a mid-layer, often red, and a top layer in various colours. __________________ http://netsukenow.blogspot.com/ |
| Loading... | |
AFNetsuke

Registered: Dec 09, 2008
Posts: 632
|
| | Aug 10, 2010 at 07:46 PM | Reply with quote | #28 |
|
Thanks, fk. Perhaps you could show us some lacquer pieces from your collection (I assume you have some since you sound knowlegable) to display various techniques. Even (or especially?) worn pieces that demonstrate the various underlayers would be nice to see if you describe them for us. Do particular inlays or different methods of building up takamaki-e, etc. help with age determination at all? |
| Loading... | |
fk Registered: June 30, 2009
Posts: 144
|
| | Aug 11, 2010 at 02:20 AM | Reply with quote | #29 |
|
I don't have a collection, AF, just one very damaged tray-for-export, which was my grandmother's and, once, a set of bowls that were lost in a house move; they were also hers.
The image of the tray is below; the piece is stained, burned, chipped and was well used, though not now. It's about 2' 3" x 1' 3". I don't have any close-ups, though. There's been some discussion about the use of red lacquer in this; some think that it was overlaid with gold and use has worn it away; I think that red was used, with some gold decoration on top, clearly visible still on the cranes and tree. It's been dated to about the 1870s, perhaps a little earlier, and was a wedding present for my great-grandparents in 1873.
I did think about having it restored, but was advised that it wasn't worth it. As it's chipped through to the wood, the layers of urushi construction are very clear; first, on the body of the tray, an ochre ground, then a red layer, then the shiny black layer; on the edges, there appears to be only an ochre layer. It must have looked quite impressive when new, and, valuable or not, I still love the cranes. The red layer is an iron oxide and urushi mix called benigara.
I'm interested in lacquerware and there have been discussions of the process in relation to netsuke on the Following the Iron Brush forum, where there are a few practitioners:
http://www.followingtheironbrush.org/viewforum.php?f=63
On the age issue, I don't know enough about lacquerware to know if the technique varied through time or from region to region; as far as I'm so far aware, lacquerwork age is determined through design.
Here are some urushi-making videos, which will give you an idea of the process:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2saT9UEtj_M http://tinyurl.com/354lc94 (2 parts)
Attached Images:
__________________ http://netsukenow.blogspot.com/ |
| Loading... | |
AFNetsuke

Registered: Dec 09, 2008
Posts: 632
|
| | Aug 11, 2010 at 08:51 PM | Reply with quote | #30 |
|
Thanks, fk. It's a neat family heirloom. I would have guessed you must have a lacquer collection based on your knowlege. Thanks for sharing. Perhaps others can show us some examples. |
| Loading... | |